This is Delicate Arch, a 52-foot-tall freestanding natural sandstone arch located in Arches National Park, near Moab, Utah. The hike to the arch takes about 1.5 ??“ 2 hours with a steep, exposed slickrock ascent in the first half and a narrow ledge walk wide enough for about 1.5 people near the arch itself. The Milky Way is near vertical in late summer and the best time to shoot it is in September.
I’ve made the hike three times and will tell you from experience that the slickrock holds heat, so expect it to be hot. The route across the open sandstone is easy to follow and the footing is solid but uneven. Arriving well before sunset matters if you want a good shooting perspective ??“ it does get crowded. However, the crowds dissipate as soon as the sun sets usually leaving only photographers waiting for darkness and galactic core to appear. You’ll be in relatively steep a bowl, so there’s not a lot of moving around once you arrive at the arch ??“ another reason to arrive early.
Meanwhile when you descend to go home, you’ll be heading down in the dark. A good headlamp is essential, and visibility is limited and you need to move more deliberately than you did on the way up especially around the ledges. I waited for people to start heading down and when I saw a group leave, I would follow about 50 yards back. So, in addition to my own headlamp, I was able to follow the lights of the group.
Light painting is no longer allowed in Arches, so I’m fortunate I got this shot when I did ??“ although I’m sure photographers are still light painting there ??“ heck there’s no ranger station. The nice part about shooting the MW in September is the galactic core is visible in the early evening, which means you can be back in Moab and in bed before midnight.
Canon 1DX ??“ Sigma 20mm f1,4 Art lens (rented) ??“ ISO -12800 ??“ f2.5 ??“ 15 second Tv
6 comments posted
Ian Cambourne
A great image Butch. As a friend of mine says "All artists must suffer at some point for their art." So a 1.5 hour hike on hot and slippery rocks, followed by a return trip in the dark is the suffering you had to endure. And I'm glad you did endure. I particularly like the way you put the bright light behind the arch itself, and the amount of painting is just right. Very well captured, processed and presented.   Posted: 07/03/2026 13:36:43
Butch Mazzuca
Thanks for your kind words - and it's not really suffering, it's just that age catches up with us and the adventure is less fun than it used to be - nonetheless, I was focused on the pot of gold at the end of the hike, especially on the way down :-) Thanks again, it's one of my favorites   Posted: 07/03/2026 15:26:52
Sherry Icardi
I visited Arches and absolutely loved the spot. We did Monument Valley and Arches consecutively. I did indeed do that hike ....what I found difficult was you kept going up and down (losing ground each time!). It was hot and sweaty physical labor ! But I rejoiced when we got to the top and then spied the small ledge that circles around to get to the arch! I could not do it! I have a fear of falling and every time I looked at it...my brain said no way! So while I did the hike...I did not personally get to see the Arch!
I love your image...spot on between the Arch and the Milky Way....some regrets on my part that I did not go all the way, but I made it to the top and decided to be happy with that!   Posted: 07/07/2026 18:07:49
Butch Mazzuca
Oh No! You were steps away from bowl - but I know what you mean, that ledge is about two feet wide with a pretty good drop off on one side and a rock face on the other - but it's more exciting going down in dark :-) - Glad you made the hike - Arches is a very special place and the best place I've ever shot the Milky Way.   Posted: 07/07/2026 19:17:05
Raymond Tice
Butch - a masterful image and all the more special because of the effort involved and I appreciate the presence of subtle colors in the night sky. Having a great shot of the milky way core with a superb foreground is, well, on every night photographers bucket list but can only be achieved with a great deal of effort, just like you experienced. So, a sincere congratulations is in order. I am interested in knowing how you processed the image given such a high iso. Also, is the lighter area near the horizon Moab? Ray   Posted: 07/09/2026 02:09:03
Butch Mazzuca
Ray - I much appreciate your very kind words - yes, there was effort, but all of know photography can be a labor of love - so yes, it took energy but the payoff was well worth it. Just climbing to the bowl 'felt' good -
I don't want to dodge your question but I don't process any two images alike save for the basic 4 steps after import into LrC - I just wing it until the image looks like what I saw save for the drama I try to add in post. But I do recall playing with exposure, highlights and contrast - I honestly can't tell you what I did.
And yes, that's Moab - hence the title, Lights Over Moab - I wrestled with removing them, but it's the lights that act as a tertiary subject that IMO give the image a very distinctive identity. Thanks again for your kind words.   Posted: 07/09/2026 04:05:47