I am not able to resolve this. I just see double.   Posted: 08/02/2026 15:01:57

I wanted to like this, but it is uncomfortable to view. Please refer to the 1/30 or 1/50 rule. Which is basically that the interaxial between the two lenses should be 1/30th the distance to the closest subject. Or maybe 1/50 to be conservative depending on your screen size. So if it's grains of salt, it's measured in microns. If it's a mountain from an airplane, it's measured in hundreds of meters.

If you look at the anaglyph version in the corner enlarged, you will see clearly that the horizontal separation is way more than 3% of the overall image width. Sometimes, if you have a lot of negative parallax, you can get away with another 2%. But you exceeded that too. I encourage you to try again with this in mind.   Posted: 08/03/2026 04:21:56

I agree with Andrew. The image does not violate the window, and it's well focused front to back. But the parallax is nearly double what it should be. This image would be more easy to view if you adjusted the window by 50%, and cropped most of the background.   Posted: 08/04/2026 03:08:34

Good subject for close-up photo. The image is sharp and well focused n the subject. Slightly uncomfortable to view and depth is shallow. For a stronger 3D effect, a slightly larger stereo base may help. Busy background and the dark pot in the top background are distractions. A different angle may help.   Posted: 08/21/2026 07:44:40