Adi Ben-Senior
About the Image(s)
I'm posting it as a continuation of the conversation with Michael H. regarding the Sep session.
The idea is to add a "tension element" out of place in the scene. In this example it is the trash bin that is a distraction the viewer away from the subject.
The element needs to be different from the colors / textures / context ( in this case all three) . By adding a tension element the viewer's eye is traveling between the net and the bin back and forth creating an engagement. This is resulting in the opposite of what one would expect - but in fact a longer view of the picture a deeper discovery of the subject.
Naturally these are my practices that I have developed over the years and just wanted to share that with the group rather than make a monthly showcase. I hope you find it productive.
Specifically: I took this picture at Santa Monica Pier last week in LA with a Fuji Xpro 2 with a 35mm lens S 1/4000 F8 iso 400
This round’s discussion is now closed!
10 comments posted
I find it intriguing. My eyes triangulate between the two posts and the bin. And, I appreciate all the markings of activity in the sand.   Posted: 10/02/2024 23:56:29
I do like the minimalist composition with its extensive negative space. I struggle with the concept of "tension" in imagery. Curious, in your opinion how would you help me understand the differences between positive (good) tension and negative ("bad") tension in a photograph.   Posted: 10/03/2024 19:26:50
1. If the trash was inside the frame (not close to the margins) - there will no tension
2. There is no good nor bad tension point. We are simply trying to keep the viewer engaged with the composition longer.   Posted: 10/08/2024 23:55:09
  Posted: 10/08/2024 13:56:25
I also feel if the Trash Bin was (more) inside the main frame it would still act as a point (or reference) for Tension ...
Overall, I do believe you have secured the tension you are looking for, but the point of Tension really flirts with going outside the frame and thus, many viewers may actually interpret this as a mistake, not so much part of the "compositional structure" you intended. It's a close call for sure! Well done for presenting this intriguing piece.   Posted: 10/27/2024 00:51:27